On May 30, 2002, the provincial government introduced Bill 56, which is designed to develop and ensure a more responsive workers’ compensation system. The new bill reduces the levels of review and appeal of Workers’ Compensation Board decisions from three down to two, creates a new internal review function to improve the quality of decision-making and establishes a new, independent appeal tribunal as the final level of appeal for workers’ compensation matters. The more important of the proposed amendments are listed and summarized below.
Definitions
The proposed amendments repeal the definition of “review board”, pursuant to the elimination of that board, and add the following two definitions:
“appeal tribunal” means the Workers’ Compensation Appeal Tribunal established under Part 4;
“review officer” means an officer of the Board who is designated under section 96.6.
Certifying WCB findings for courts
The repeal of section 11 of the Workers’ Compensation Act (WCA) removes the Board’s authority to certify findings for court actions. Previously, the Board, under request from a court could determine any matter that was relevant to the court action and within its competence under the WCA, and certify those determinations to the court. That power would fall under the purview of the proposed appeal tribunal.
Classes and subclasses
The proposed amendments will clarify and facilitate the Board’s authority and ability to establish classes and subclasses of subclasses for the purpose of making assessments to maintain the accident fund.
Medical Review Panels
Bill 56 repeals sections of the WCA that provide for the establishment of medical review panels and their jurisdiction to examine workers and certify their medical findings. These repeals also eliminate rights to refer matters to a medical review panel. Previously, both workers and employers were entitled to have the worker examined by a medical review panel if they were aggrieved with the findings with a medical finding or decision of the review board, board, employer or former employer. Powers pertaining to ordering a medical review or re-examination would fall under the purview of the appeal tribunal.
Workers’ Compensation Board – Jurisdiction
The major change proposed by Bill 56 is the elimination of both the Workers’ Compensation Review Board and the appeals division of the Workers’ Compensation Board and establishes in their stead the Workers’ Compensation Appeal Tribunal. This new Tribunal is established in Part IV of the WCA, and shall be discussed shortly. Due to the establishment of the new Appeal Tribunal, there are a number of changes pertaining to the review and appeal procedures of the Workers’ Compensation Board. Some of the key effects of these changes are:
Review Officers
Bill 56 also establishes a review officer, and empowers that person to review decisions made by the Board. The section that establishes the position and responsibilities of the review officer allows for the following:
The Appeal Tribunal
The most important amendment introduced in Bill 56 is the establishment of an Appeal Tribunal. The Appeal Tribunal will consist of:
The role of the chair
The chair is responsible for the general operation of the appeal tribunal, including:
Panels
All appeals to the tribunal must be heard by panels. These panels are established as follows:
Appeal Rights – Appeal of review decisions
Decisions made by either the Workers’ Compensation Board or the review officer may be appealed to the appeal tribunal, subject to certain restrictions. In an appeal, the appeal tribunal may consider all questions of fact and law arising in the appeal, but is not bound by legal precedent.
Time limit
An appeal must be filed within 30 days of the decision, although exceptions will be made if an injustice would otherwise result.
Appeal Proceedings
Subject to any rules, practices or procedures established by the chair, the appeal tribunal may conduct an appeal in the manner it considers necessary. This may include:
Medical Practitioner Assistance
The chair must establish a list of medical practitioners that may be retained to provide assistance or advice. If the appeal tribunal determines that an issue on an appeal concerns the Board’s medical finding or decision, the presiding member may require the worker to submit to an examination by one or more of the medical practitioners from the list composed by the chair.
Appeal tribunal decisions
A decision from the appeal tribunal is required within 180 days after the appeal is commenced, subject to any delay or suspension of the proceedings. Any decision or action of the chair or the appeal tribunal is final, and is not open to question or review in any court, although an appeal to the chair of the appeal tribunal is available if new evidence comes to light.
Certification to the Court
When a court action is commenced based on a disability caused by occupational disease, a personal injury or death, under request from a court, the appeal tribunal may determine any matter that is relevant to the court action and within its competence under the WCA, and certify those determinations to the court.